- Written by
- December 31st, 1969
- Add a comment
After all, let us be frank. How is that adolescent son or daughter presumed to realize that mom and dad who've never done anything crazy before, and may even go to church every Sunday, are now jumping in a hot tub with a group of nude people and it is not
January 7th, 2017, 10:02PM
To some non-naturist friend or relative, naked = sex. Span. The naturism-textile cross-cultural communication gap is a vast emptiness, consisting of a deficiency of common expertise and language to join two worlds as foreign as the Ithaca area, upstate New York culture I left, and the Hessisch and PfAlzer German culture I was suddenly immersed into.<br/>The nudie has little or no exact language to communicate her new experience, and the non-nudie has no expertise base from which to interpret the vague language. Metaphorically speaking we may believe we're saying schwIl but we are actually saying schwul when we insist to the fabric, that naturism is nonsexual nudity. Then we wonder why the non-nudist frowns, nuts, furrows his brow, or bursts out in laughter. It's really not even the correct area to begin the dialogue.<br/>OK fellow nudies, can not we just declare click ? We have a cross-cultural communication dilemma of major proportions. If we continue to insist to the textile world that naturism is only nonsexual, particularly within an increasingly hypersexual world, we're going to need to find better language to get it done. Our language, as it pertains to sexology, is rather weak.<br/>Consider the Eskimos. They have 13 words for snow in a highly developed culture of snow. They share common snow language and common snow encounter. Sex is a little more complex than snow, so we can do better than to insist that being nude is somehow completely void of sexuality. After all, in naturism, our genitalia, our sex if you will, is in plain sight.<br/>If you take offense at someone seeing your *****or vulva, then obviously http://troyxxx.com/tube/nudist/9nudist.php 'll not be a naturist. On the other hand, most cloths would consider exposure of their naked body to anyone other than their spouse, either underhanded seduction, or some sort of sexual abuse. So, is not it kind of odd that we insist so strongly that our societal nudity is non-sexual? After all, it is not the impartial parts of our bodies, like our elbows, fingers, or toes that elicit such powerful emotions. NO! It truly is explicitly our exposed http://kazyz.com/tube/nudism/sexy-nudist-boy.php that brings out such reactions.<br/>I believe if we hope to win the battles of today to grow naturism it's important to be honest with ourselves, and to understand where many of the cloths we are trying to reach may be coming from. And it will not do to insist that schwul is not schwIl non-nudists don't get the difference!<br/>In view of the preceding, sex-positive is a fantastic start at developing a whole new, fuller, richer vocabulary surrounding naturism and sexuality. Let's stop faking naturism has nothing to do with sexuality in the non-naturist head it does, and we should start there. Also, for us naturists, sex-positive is a way to start being more confident about our own sexuality and hence more genuine with the fabric world. Instead of being reactive and negative about sexuality, perhaps we can take a lead role in teaching about really fulfilling sexuality.<br/>This in turn challenges us to a deeper understanding of our naked encounters and our sexuality, and how we may connect them metaphorically to similar textile experiences in ways that makes the non-naturist want to consider naturism as a real alternative. Maybe we should consider this just because many fabrics are looking for a means to bring balance, meaning, and fulfillment with their sexuality.<br/><br/>And so we must take a deeper look inside and genuinely ask, is our naturism as non-sexual as we appear to say to the non-naturist? What are we're afraid of, that keeps us from confronting sexuality in naturism? Does the fabric world see something that we don't desire to see?<br/>All of this is why we need at least some change in our understanding, our experience, and our development of new language as we face shifting sexuality within cloth culture and naturism. Sex-positive. It is the first step in dealing with these changes, and hopefully in reaching many new folks, to ensure that they too may experience the freedom and delight that we've experienced.<br/>In this blog we have considered a substantial problem in reaching the cloth world is that there surely is a cross-cultural communication gap between our world and theirs. There is a deficiency of common language and expertise to bridge this difference or deal with shifting sexuality.<br/>
After all, let us be frank. How is that adolescent son or daughter presumed to realize that mom and dad who've never done anything crazy before, and may even go to church every Sunday, are now jumping in a hot tub with a group of nude people and it is not
January 7th, 2017, 10:02PM
To some non-naturist friend or relative, naked = sex. Span. The naturism-textile cross-cultural communication gap is a vast emptiness, consisting of a deficiency of common expertise and language to join two worlds as foreign as the Ithaca area, upstate New York culture I left, and the Hessisch and PfAlzer German culture I was suddenly immersed into.<br/>The nudie has little or no exact language to communicate her new experience, and the non-nudie has no expertise base from which to interpret the vague language. Metaphorically speaking we may believe we're saying schwIl but we are actually saying schwul when we insist to the fabric, that naturism is nonsexual nudity. Then we wonder why the non-nudist frowns, nuts, furrows his brow, or bursts out in laughter. It's really not even the correct area to begin the dialogue.<br/>OK fellow nudies, can not we just declare click ? We have a cross-cultural communication dilemma of major proportions. If we continue to insist to the textile world that naturism is only nonsexual, particularly within an increasingly hypersexual world, we're going to need to find better language to get it done. Our language, as it pertains to sexology, is rather weak.<br/>Consider the Eskimos. They have 13 words for snow in a highly developed culture of snow. They share common snow language and common snow encounter. Sex is a little more complex than snow, so we can do better than to insist that being nude is somehow completely void of sexuality. After all, in naturism, our genitalia, our sex if you will, is in plain sight.<br/>If you take offense at someone seeing your *****or vulva, then obviously http://troyxxx.com/tube/nudist/9nudist.php 'll not be a naturist. On the other hand, most cloths would consider exposure of their naked body to anyone other than their spouse, either underhanded seduction, or some sort of sexual abuse. So, is not it kind of odd that we insist so strongly that our societal nudity is non-sexual? After all, it is not the impartial parts of our bodies, like our elbows, fingers, or toes that elicit such powerful emotions. NO! It truly is explicitly our exposed http://kazyz.com/tube/nudism/sexy-nudist-boy.php that brings out such reactions.<br/>I believe if we hope to win the battles of today to grow naturism it's important to be honest with ourselves, and to understand where many of the cloths we are trying to reach may be coming from. And it will not do to insist that schwul is not schwIl non-nudists don't get the difference!<br/>In view of the preceding, sex-positive is a fantastic start at developing a whole new, fuller, richer vocabulary surrounding naturism and sexuality. Let's stop faking naturism has nothing to do with sexuality in the non-naturist head it does, and we should start there. Also, for us naturists, sex-positive is a way to start being more confident about our own sexuality and hence more genuine with the fabric world. Instead of being reactive and negative about sexuality, perhaps we can take a lead role in teaching about really fulfilling sexuality.<br/>This in turn challenges us to a deeper understanding of our naked encounters and our sexuality, and how we may connect them metaphorically to similar textile experiences in ways that makes the non-naturist want to consider naturism as a real alternative. Maybe we should consider this just because many fabrics are looking for a means to bring balance, meaning, and fulfillment with their sexuality.<br/><br/>And so we must take a deeper look inside and genuinely ask, is our naturism as non-sexual as we appear to say to the non-naturist? What are we're afraid of, that keeps us from confronting sexuality in naturism? Does the fabric world see something that we don't desire to see?<br/>All of this is why we need at least some change in our understanding, our experience, and our development of new language as we face shifting sexuality within cloth culture and naturism. Sex-positive. It is the first step in dealing with these changes, and hopefully in reaching many new folks, to ensure that they too may experience the freedom and delight that we've experienced.<br/>In this blog we have considered a substantial problem in reaching the cloth world is that there surely is a cross-cultural communication gap between our world and theirs. There is a deficiency of common language and expertise to bridge this difference or deal with shifting sexuality.<br/>